Dibrini's Pot

Dibrini’s Pot



Unlike human pot, Dibrini’s pot is described as a home, an origin, of Dibrini. And unlike human pot, this pot is IMPORTANT.

The concept of looking at Dibrini’s pot is looking at and seeking for an importance in an unimportant thing. This is what makes Dibrini’s pot important. It is good, perhaps, to back up the importance with the unimportance that relates to it instead of some made-up reason that needs to be backed up by something else. Backing the importance with the unimportance is in return assigning an importance to the unimportance. Then, the unimportance transforms to an importance.

The Dibrinian concept of importance vs unimportance rejects the neglect of unimportance because it is “not important” on the grounds that there is nothing unimportant in this world. Everything must be important is some way. A small drop of water creates an ocean. Whiteness determines what blackness is. And transparency is at one end opposite to opacity. Therefore, the importance is recognised because it outstands from the unimportance. If there is no unimportance in this world, there cannot be an importance. If everything is important, NOTHING can be important. And everything becomes unimportant.

In Dibrini’s pot, and every other pot, there are a lot more of unimportant things left undiscovered. Dibrini insists, then, that it is worth that human explore these important things.

POT

Pot

Human Pot is a utensil in a kitchen used to cook liquid food. A pot is often made of metal receptive to heat because heat is the important element in human cooking.

Some other objects that have similar shape to that of a pot can be referred to as a (something) pot. An adjective is often put in front of the word “pot” to make a distinction from a cooking pot, for example, a flower pot.

Human Pot is often seen in kitchen, and there only. Not in front of a house, not on a study desk, not in bed. If a pot is seen out of kitchen, it means that the pot is probably misplaced or neglected. But practically, it is more often than not that a pot be neglected somewhere other than in a kitchen. This is because a cooking pot is used for cooking. And cooking is not considered an important task. Some of expressions such as “it’s only cooking” or no cooking” are often heard in human society. This is because cooking is a task of a servant, a mom, a woman, or a no one. A king, a leader of a family, a millionaire, an entrepreneur, or an average man doesn’t cook, at least not normally. If a man, whatever type of man he is, cooks, it is likely to be a “special occasion”. And at the end of the day, at the end of cooking, cleaning the pot and other cleaning job are left to a woman, whatever type of woman she is.

And the thing is, in human society, men are the dominant over women.

For example, if a man routinely cooks, he probably has a career as a chef. And the food he cooks and his process of cooking are called “artworks” or often “a master piece”. The man is probably wearing a clean white uniform invented especially for male chefs by other man; it looks really ridiculous on a woman. It can even call “classic” way to cook if the man touches the food he is cooking by his bare hand. Contrarily, if a woman cooks routinely, that’s because she’s doing a housework—one of many others—for men in the house such her husband, her husband’s father, her son, etc. In the occasion that she doesn’t cook, for whatever reason she comes up with she might be blamed for not being a good woman. What she wears during cooking is the clothes she wears to work. And the food she cooks regardless of its great taste and mouth-watering smell is called breakfast, lunch, and dinner for its best taste and richest nutrition, and called “junk” for its being unable to satisfy the turbulent expectations of the eaters.

So, as a representation of a woman position in regards to cooking and human society, a pot, like a woman, is not considered an important object in life (defined by men) but it seems that world can’t spin without it. When a male chef came home from his big cooking show, without a pot his wife would fail to act as a good wife. And the male chef would blame her for not being a good wife. He wouldn’t think for at least a moment of the pot that had gone missing. Because the pot was not important. And he wouldn’t think either that it was him that morning who nonsensically brought it out the garden and carelessly left it there and his wife couldn’t find it.

VERSION

Version

Version is a REinterpretation of something that in the end provides a significant detectable difference. Everything in human world can have versions. This is because through time human’s biggest business is trying to define and finalise things as what they termed “universality”. Even the term “universality” is a version of a referent.

Postmodern interpretation of discourse criticise this human behaviour by stating that their finalisation of things only creates another version of truth. It holds the celebration of the fact that there is no such thing as “truth” but only “versions of truth”. This being so makes a nonsense of the search for truth.

However, the postmodern celebration of versions of truth is actually only another version of truth in human world. Yet again they have defined and tried to finalise by saying that it’s only “another version”.

These versions, perhaps, do not exist outside the imaginations of those who yearn for them.

ADVANTAGE AND DISADVANTAGE

Advantage




Rather than good, useful, or comfortable, ADVANTAGE is something “preferred”.


If you see an advantage in something, it means you like it, are attracted by it. You “assume” that it is good, from the way you feel about it.

So, advantage is all about feelings. Purely. And then, the next thing human would do is finding some “publicly acceptable” explanation for something having an advantage.

More than that, human seem to have a lot of fun trying to define and set the standard for what advantage should be.

Human try to hide away their feelings by covering them up with some standard they create just because some “no one” has said feeling is not a valid reason!




Disadvantage




Rather than being in the opposite side of advantage, DISADVANTAGE has nothing different from ADVANTAGE in terms of concept described above.

It is only the prejudice and blindness of human that make them perceive disadvantage differently from advantage.